Additionally, every change you make in Camera Raw effectively changes the noise profile for that particular image. incadescent, flourescent) will not be perfect for the shots you take in a club lit entirely by coloured spotlights, or industrial floodlights, etc. Both programs let you make "custom" profiles for your particular camera, but what I've learnt is that the profile you make at home under normal "home" lighting (e.g. My general finding was that (Neat Image, Edit->Fade 80-90%) is pretty much identical to Noise Ninja.Īs to the quality, it really depends on how much time you want to spend profiling. I recently downloaded the trial version of Noise Ninja, and tested them both on the same images. I've been using Neat Image for years now. In my opinion, "Are they worth buying" is the same answer as "will you ever shoot anything over ASA 400?" Eliminating noise can reduce file sizes significantly. Noise adds a bunch of useless information to a file. There's another side benefit to using noise reduction: It decreases the file size for many images. Besides, sharpening should be saved for last and since noise reduction is usually done first it's best to skip any sharpening in the noise reduction process. It's old school hamfisted USM and unflattering for most photos. The D2H tends to exaggerate red noise so if there's actual red in the photo - such as a red blouse - I have to strike a balance between reducing red noise and maintaining the saturation of the desirable red colors. I'll also adjust the saturation slider to accomodate the information in the photo. While NN is pretty effective at reducing green and red splotches at the default settings I'll usually bump it up +5. Most of the tweaking I do is in the color (chroma) noise section. I don't change the contrast because even tho' NN reduces contrast slightly I prefer to fix this later in post processing. I might bump the smoothness slider to +5 because this particular slider is very subtle. Then, in the luminance noise section, I pull back the strength slider to -5. I start out with the camera/ISO specific profiles in Noise Ninja. I prefer to keep most of the luminance noise because it resembles film grain and adds to the documentary feel that I like. Most of the problem is chroma noise, botchy reddish and greenish stuff. ![]() The D2H is a great camera but very noisy at 1600. After his open heart surgery I didn't want to use flash so I've been relying on my Nikon D2H at ISO 8. ![]() I've been documenting my newborn nephew's life since he was born a little over a week ago with a serious heart condition. Anyone who complains about waxy skin or overdone noise reduction isn't using these tools effectively.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |